This section describes the various types of academic appointments available in the College of Pharmacy and the important aspects of promotion and tenure.
3. Criteria For Appointment And Promotion
The University Handbook has additional material of importance to this process. Please refer to the current University of Findlay Faculty Handbook. In all cases, the more stringent of College of Pharmacy or University criteria will take precedence.
4. Promotion Review Procedures For Tenure-Track Faculty
The following section provides further explanation of how performance is to be evaluated internally and lists the specific procedures, areas to be evaluated, and criteria for evaluation for the main areas of teaching, scholarship, and service. The material collected shall be the same as that required for mid tenure review by the university, except in the case that the College of Pharmacy requests additional information.
1. Evaluation of Teaching Performance
The College of Pharmacy requires peer evaluation of teaching performance in the context of a College of Pharmacy Peer Review System. Such evaluations are used for internal and personal teaching development. These peer reviews do not contribute to the university’s decisions regarding promotion and tenure in a substantial way. The Dean of the College of Pharmacy will assure coordination with The University of Findlay Faculty Handbook in this matter. The primary tool for evaluation of teaching performance for promotion and tenure purposes is the University of Findlay’s student evaluation system.
a. Peer Review System
The purpose of the peer review system is to provide a systematic evaluation of teaching so that a performance profile of each candidate may be presented to the Pharmacy Faculty Affairs Committee for its consideration in the internal promotion/tenure process. The peer review committee is formed upon the request of the Department Chair or the candidate, six months to one academic year prior to promotional consideration. A standard template will be used. A distinct peer review committee shall be established for each candidate.
(ii) Committee Composition
The peer review committee, comprised of three faculty members, is formed in the following manner:
1) the Dean will be asked to serve as Chairperson or the Dean shall designate a vice-chair (normally the department chair, unless the chair is being considered) for this purpose;
2) the Faculty Affairs Committee will assign one of its members; and
3) a faculty member will be selected by the candidate; this member must be from the College of Pharmacy
(iii) Evaluation Mechanism
1) In order to collect appropriate data, the candidate should inform the peer review committee of the pending promotion no later than the beginning of the Fall semester of the academic year in which the promotion is to be recommended. This notice should include a list of courses, both graduate, and undergraduate, in which the candidate is to be evaluated.
2) In the event that there are several distinct types of teaching being performed (e.g. classroom lecturing, clinical rotations, small group discussions), more than one type should be evaluated.
3) The evaluation has two components: observation of actual teaching and analysis of teaching materials. These two activities will provide the necessary data for the review committee's evaluation.
(a) Observation - Each member of the review committee is to observe the candidate at least twice. It is recommended that the review committee members conduct evaluations at separate times so that separate observations can be used for the evaluation process. The times of the actual observations will not be announced to the candidate.
(b) Analysis of teaching material and methods - The committee will collect and analyze the course material (e.g., course syllabus, exams) and may consult with experienced persons in the appropriate subject areas.
4) The review committee will base its evaluation of teaching performance on the developed criteria for preparation, delivery, and interaction with students that are outlined further in this report.
5) The peer review committee will submit to the Faculty Affairs Committee a report containing:
(a) reviewers' individual ratings of performance in the three areas of preparation, delivery, and interaction with students, and
(b) individual ratings of overall teaching performance.
6) The Faculty Affairs Committee will use the data within this report along with information obtained from the letter of recommendation from the Dean in the consideration of the candidate's overall teaching performance. The letter of recommendation will also address consistency of teaching performance over time.
b. Areas of Evaluation by Peer Committee
The peer review committee will base its evaluation on three broad areas: 1) preparation, 2) delivery and 3) interaction with students. Under these areas, several items have been proposed. The items address primarily the general lecture format with alternative format (small group, clinical and laboratory teaching) being discussed when appropriate. If adequate material is not available from classroom observation, the Peer Review Committee shall request documentation from the faculty member to allow for evaluation for any of the following areas.
c. Criteria for Evaluation of Teaching by the Peer Review Committee
As stated earlier, the Peer Review Committee will evaluate the candidate in three main areas of 1) preparation, 2) delivery and 3) student interaction. Using a four-point Likert scale (strongly agree -agree - disagree - strongly disagree), Peer Review Committee members will rank the candidate's performance of each item listed under "Areas of Evaluation" (e.g. the candidate speaks clearly). The scores from these Likert scales will be tallied and the peer reviewers will then assign a poor, good, excellent or distinguished rating to each of the three areas based on the composite score. The criteria evaluated in each of these three main areas will be defined below.
The individual peer reviewers will also assign an overall rating of teaching performance of poor, good, excellent or distinguished. The Peer Review Committee will not be asked to reach a consensus opinion about the candidate's teaching ability. The Faculty Affairs Committee will use the three individual ratings rather than one committee-wide rating during the final deliberations. Each of these areas will then be assigned a rating according to the following criteria. When applicable, actual materials evaluated will be provided by the Peer Review Committee to the Faculty Affairs Committee.
1. Lectures are organized in a reasonable manner.
2. In clinical teaching, the activities and exercises are organized in a reasonable manner.
3. In laboratory teaching, the necessary equipment is available and operational and the teaching assistants are well informed of their responsibilities.
4. In small group discussion, the topics and points of discussion are organized in a reasonable manner.
5. Course materials are well organized and prepared in a timely fashion.
6. If participating in a team-taught course, he/she is actively involved in assisting in the administration of the course and follows the schedule, etc., as established by the course master.
7. If the candidate is a course coordinator:
a. The lectures are scheduled in an organized and logical fashion consistent with course objectives and overall curriculum.
b. In team-taught courses, the faculty team members are informed of the progress of the course and student performance and the course is conducted in a smooth manner.
B. Course Objectives
1. The students are provided with objectives for the material presented.
2. Syllabus represents activities demonstrated in the course
3. The students are provided information to help them relate each section of the course with other sections of the course, other courses, and with practice.
4. If the candidate is a coordinator, the students are provided information concerning the goals, objectives and grading system of the course and the expectations of the faculty.
C. Course Content
1. The course content encompasses the up-to-date body of knowledge generally taught under the course title.
2. The course is revised yearly to include new material and special effort is expanded by the instructor to acquire and maintain pertinent areas of expertise.
3. Students are provided an adequately detailed syllabus of the course along with written, oral or reading assignments.
4. In clinical teaching, the candidate is proficient at the clinical skills he/she is teaching the student and demonstrates the ability to teach and guide students in acquiring these skills.
5. The candidate demonstrates the ability to teach and guide students in acquiring research skills.
1. Exams correspond to the stated objectives.
Administers examinations, quizzes, and assessments utilizing clear and concise language comprised of material that was previously assigned
E. Innovative Course Development and Improvement The candidate has:
1. Developed totally new courses
2. Developed new segments of existing courses
3. Initiated and/or participated in school-wide changes in teaching methods of curriculum
A. Communication Skills
1. Speaks clearly and effectively
2. Answers questions clearly
3. Has poise in various situations
4. Demonstrates an interest in presenting the materials
5. Motivates students to become involved with the material
6. In lecture, addresses the audience, not the blackboard or screen; uses audiovisual aids appropriately; organizes presentation well
7. In small group, leads the discussion effectively, and does not dominate the discussion if meant to be an open discussion
8. In one-on-one teaching, provides guidance and direction to the student and answers questions as well as directs the students in answering their own questions
9. In clinical settings, serves as a role model to students in dealing with patients and other health professionals
10. Develops innovative teaching applications such as web-based education
11. Devotes a significant effort to improving student learning
B. Understanding of the Material
1. Displays an adequate as well as up-to-date knowledge of course content
2. Is able to convey the knowledge to student in an understandable manner
III. Interaction with Students
A. Student motivation The faculty member’s impact on student motivation could be evidenced by:
1. The student's selection of a special project elective
2. A student's pursuit of an advanced degree (M.S., Ph.D.)
3. A student's participation in "non-traditional" or "innovative" pharmacy practice
4. A student's participation in school or health-group sponsored activities
5. A student's interest in a particular area of the discipline studies (graduate program)
B. Student Assistance
1. is understanding of students' problems,
2. is generally available and receptive to students in an office setting, and
3. provides or assists in providing special individual tutoring relating to the student's needs.
2. Evaluation Of Scholarly Activity
The university has a rubric posted for this evaluation. This description is meant to expand on that rubric and exceed it. An important part of this evaluation is continuity of effort and outcomes.
The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the quality and quantity of the candidate's activity in scholarly areas. The Pharmacy Faculty Affairs Committee has developed a list of all areas that will be given consideration under the scholarship requirements for tenure and/or promotion. These are listed under "Areas of Evaluation" with a description of how accomplishments in each area will be weighted during deliberations. These standards should be higher than undergraduate programs at The University of Findlay.
(ii) Evaluation Mechanism
1) The candidate is to prepare a list of his/her scholarly activities.
The candidate should submit to the College of Pharmacy (COP) Faculty Affairs Committee a description of each activity.
2) The COP Faculty Affairs Committee will use the information within this report, along with information provided by the Dean, to rate the candidate as being poor, good, excellent or distinguished according to the developed criteria discussed further in this section.
b. Areas of Evaluation
The Faculty Affairs Committee recognizes that publication in refereed journals is the single best indication of scholarship available to the committee for evaluation. Journals include those in both the Basic Science and the Clinical area. Priority is given to publication in the most prestigious journal(s) in each field. Publications in preparation will not be considered.
(ii) Papers Read (including poster sessions) at Scientific or Professional Meetings
In general, significance of papers will be judged in the following manner. There are exceptions to these general weightings due to the variation in the quality and impact of the various works.
National > Regional > State-Local Invited > Submitted Reviewed > Non-reviewed Original Work > Review Paper
Abstracts are considered only as adjuncts to papers read and not as publications and should not be listed under publications.
Attendance at meetings is not considered evidence of scholarship.
(iii) Grants and Contracts
a. The following ranking system is generally recommended:
b. Approved and Funded > Approved > Submitted
c. Grants or contracts in preparation will not be considered.
d. Principal Investigator > Co-Investigator
e. Consideration will be given to percentage of time devoted to project and responsibilities of the investigator.
f. Full Grants > Starter Grants
g. Outside Agency Grants > In-house Grants (within University)
h. Creative Grants > Service Grants
(iv) Creative Endeavors in Professional Practice
1) Evidence of establishment of new or innovative types of pharmacy services
2) Evidence that the practice has had or continues to have demonstrable effect on health care outcome within a practice setting
3) Evidence that the practice has influenced the nature of other types of health care delivery (i.e. prescribing of physicians or medication administration by nurses) toward more optimal delivery of health care
4) Evidence that the practice has led directly to the establishment of new standards of care within the practice setting or with the profession.
a. The evidence for each of the above may be presented in the form of encounter data, audit data or consultation data. Such data must be accompanied by letters of reference from department heads and professional peers.
(v) Special Lectures (Invited)
1. This category includes presentations to university groups, governmental agencies, professional organizations, and industrial gatherings that impart specific knowledge in a scientific area of expertise. Presentations to lay groups are not included but are considered to be service. Presentations to only students are considered under teaching.
2. This category would include panel participation provided participation is based on scientific and/or professional expertise.
3. This category does not include Continuing Education that would be considered under teaching.
4. This category does not include chairing sessions at meetings unless a presentation is made.
5. This category does include being a workshop leader in an area of scientific or professional expertise.
b. Weighting of participation is in the following order, in general:
c. Invited Lecture > Panel Participation > Workshop Leader
1. Consulting is considered as scholarship, provided the individual person is being called upon as an individual or a member of a group, i.e. Commission, Task Force, Advisory Committee, Study Section.
b. Recognition will be weighted in the following manner:
c. National > Regional > Local
d. Serving as a Chairperson of such a group will be highly valued.
e. 2) Consultation can include advising governmental agencies, industry, professional groups or testimony in court. Participation on University of Findlay committees would be considered under service.
f. 3) Pay is not a requirement for being a consultant but all work for which one is paid will necessarily be considered under scholarship, and not under service.
a. Authorship of a patent is highly considered as evidence of creative scholarship.
(viii) Publications Other Than Reviewed Articles
a. Publications are, generally, to be weighed as follows in descending order:
1. Books or chapters in books
2. Editor of book
3. Editorial Board of professional or scientific journal
4. Referee for professional or scientific journal
5. Book reviews, Letter to the Editor in refereed journals and full length publications or regular columns in non-refereed journals
b. Publications in preparation will not be considered (except for invited articles).
(ix) Honors and Awards
a. This category includes:
1. Honorary degrees
2. Fellowship in national professional or scientific organizations
3. Awards recognizing professional and scientific achievement
(x) Continuing Education offered by organizations other than The University of Findlay
3. Evaluation Of Service
(xi) The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the quality and quantity of the candidate's activity in service areas. The Faculty Affairs Committee has developed a list of areas that will be given consideration under the service requirements for tenure and/or promotion. These areas, along with the criteria for evaluation, are discussed later in this section.
(ii) Evaluation Mechanism
1. The candidate is to prepare a list and a description of his/her past and current service activities.
2. The Faculty Affairs Committee will use this information along with the information provided by the Dean and/or the appropriate Chairpersons of committees on which the candidate has served to rate the candidate's service performance as good, excellent or distinguished.
b. Areas of Evaluation
1. The following areas of evaluation have been selected to reflect the candidate's service to the College of Pharmacy, the University, the candidate's profession, disciplines outside the candidate's own profession and the community.
(i) College of Pharmacy and University Service
1) Committee Assignments and Offices Held
a) Standing Committees and Subcommittees
b) Ad Hoc Committees
c) Task Forces
2. Special Service Activities
a) Campus or University-wide Senate or governing body
b) Adviser to student organization
c) Graduate Council and Committees
3. Administrative Service
a) Service Director (e.g., Drug Information, Poison Center, Medication Therapy Management Consultation Center)
b) Assistant or Associate Dean
d) Experiential Learning Program Director
e) Department Chair
4. Continuing Education Offered by The University of Findlay
(ii) Service to the Candidate's Profession
1) Local, State or National Board activities (including preparation or evaluation of instruments)
2) Office held in Professional Societies or Associations
3) Committee activities in Professional Societies or Associations
4) Organization of Local, State or National programs or meetings
(iii) Professional Service in Other Than the Candidate's Own Discipline Providing individual consultations in the candidate's areas of expertise with professional colleagues who are outside the area – not part of the routine job description. For example:
1) Committee Assignments (Pharmacy and Therapeutics or Human Volunteers Committees)
2) Consulting in Pharmacokinetics Laboratory
3) Consulting in Poison Center
(iv) Community or Non-University Service
1) Non-school lectures or teaching or individual consultation to lay groups in areas relevant to areas of professional expertise
2) Volunteer outreach clinical activities
3) Education or Health Care Planning Programs
4. Guidelines For Letters Of Reference From Individuals Outside Of The College of Pharmacy
As a component of the review process, the Faculty Affairs Committee will request letters of reference from individuals outside the College of Pharmacy. Reviewers will be asked to comment on the impact and quality of the candidate's contribution to professional organizations and the candidate's discipline, the quality and significance of his/her professional publications and presentations, and the candidate's national reputation and relative standing in his/her field. In the case of former teachers, co-authors, colleagues at other institutions, and others acquainted with the faculty member, these evaluators may be able to provide valuable information about teaching, professional responsibility, and other similar characteristics and activities as well as about scholarship.
E. Promotion Review Procedures For Non-Tenure Track Faculty
1. Scope And Relationship To Guidelines, Policies, And Criteria For Other Faculty Appointments
The following section provides guidelines and criteria for appointment, and promotion of Full-Time Non-Tenure Track or Part-Time Non-Tenure Track Faculty with at least a 50% appointment at the College of Pharmacy, as defined in sections II.A.2.a. or II.A.2.b. of the faculty handbook. Position titles covered by this section include Pharmacy School Assistant Professor, Pharmacy School Associate Professor, and Pharmacy School Professor. Appointment and promotion policies and procedures for Part-Time Non-tenure Track Faculty with less than a 50% appointment at the College of Pharmacy with titles Clinical Instructor, Clinical Assistant Professor, Clinical Associate Professor and Clinical Professor, are covered by section II.G. of this handbook entitled Clinical Track Faculty Appointment And Promotion Policies And Procedures.
The general philosophy and procedures for appointment and promotion (i.e., section II.B.), and criteria for appointment and promotion (i.e., section II.C.) of all faculty are consistent with the philosophy and procedures in this section. However, given the periodic and focused nature of the non-tenure track appointments, this section stresses the role of the appointment letter and faculty effort report in the faculty performance evaluation and review process. The requirements necessary to achieve the rank of Pharmacy School Associate Professor, Pharmacy School Professor, Research Associate Professor, and Research Professor are described below.
2. Appointment And Promotion
Appointment to a Non-Tenure Track Faculty position is made at a rank, for a stipulated period of time, and it is generally characterized by a defined scope within one or more of the general areas of teaching, scholarship, and service. The appointment is subject to periodic administrative review that examines both the continuing need for the position as well as a performance evaluation of the individual faculty member in the position. An appointment at the rank of Pharmacy School Assistant Professor is made by the Dean upon recommendation of the appropriate Department Chair, and does not require review or action by the Faculty Affairs Committee. Also, continuation of a non-tenure track faculty member at rank does not require evaluation or action by the Faculty Affairs Committee. There are no stipulations regarding the number of times such an appointment may be renewed or the duration of time an individual may be in such a position at rank without review by the Faculty Affairs Committee. Thus, the following evaluation and review guidelines apply only to promotions (i.e., changes in rank) or initial appointments to the rank of College of Pharmacy Associate Professor, or College of Pharmacy Professor. These guidelines and criteria have been designed to provide a balance between the focused nature of a non-tenure track appointment and the expectation that faculty members who achieve the rank of
Associate Professor or Professor must be multi-dimensional.
It is essential to have an established and clear understanding of the scope of an appointment in order for the Faculty Affairs Committee to conduct a fair evaluation. Terms and conditions of a faculty member's appointment are stated in an appointment letter from either the Dean of the College of Pharmacy or the President of the University of Findlay. Wherever possible, the scope of an appointment for Non-Tenure Track faculty should include specific assignments within the general categories of teaching, scholarship, and service, goals and objectives for these assignments, and an estimate of the proportion of effort that should be expended in each area. When re-appointments are made, the annual Faculty Review should document key elements of performance for the reporting year, as well as provide a detailed description of the faculty member's assignment and responsibilities for the coming year. Because non-tenure track faculty are often hired for a specific purpose(s), information related to the scope of the appointment is required by the Faculty Affairs Committee as part of the portfolio of information used to direct a review for initial appointment or promotion. The Faculty Affairs Committee is committed to utilizing this information to assist the faculty member hired for a specific purpose, yet it is aware that faculty assignments and activities frequently change to meet the needs of the College of Pharmacy, and/or funding agencies.
a. Evaluation Of Teaching
The evaluation of teaching is conducted according to the procedures specified in II.E. "Performance Review Procedures For Tenure-Track Faculty", section 1. "Evaluation Of Teaching Performance."
b. Evaluation Of Scholarship
The purpose of this evaluation is to assess the quality and quantity of the candidate's activity in scholarly areas. Areas of evaluation for scholarship are: Publications, Presentations, Practice, Honors and Awards, Consulting, and Grants and Contracts. The evaluation mechanism is based on information provided by the candidate in the curriculum vitae, and information provided by the Dean.
Evaluation of Service
The evaluation mechanism is based on information provided by the candidate in the curriculum vitae, and information provided by the Dean.
F. Clinical Track Faculty Appointment And Promotion
NB. We in pharmacy need these appointments, but UF policy does not now allow this. We should hold off on action here until UF catches up.
Individuals who routinely provide student education and training in experiential leaning courses are required to hold a faculty appointment with the College of Pharmacy. Clinical Track Faculty who are full-time or part-time employees of the College of Pharmacy must hold adjunct appointments at any rank. Clinical Track Faculty who are not employees of the College of Pharmacy shall hold a Clinical Track faculty appointment, including position titles of Clinical Instructor, Clinical Assistant Professor, Clinical Associate Professor and Clinical Professor.
Individuals seeking a Clinical Track faculty appointment must submit evidence of professional qualifications including information regarding their education, training, experience, service, scholarly activities, awards, and licensure. The initial rank of newly appointed Clinical Track faculty shall be consistent with the definitions outlined in University of Findlay and College of Pharmacy Policies on Appointment, Rank, and Tenure. Specifically, Clinical Instructors shall hold. as a minimum, a terminal professional degree in pharmacy (a B.S. or Pharm.D. degree). The appointee must have clearly demonstrated potential in the practice of pharmacy, and experiential teaching. To be appointed at the rank of Clinical Assistant Professor, the appointee shall hold. as a minimum. a terminal professional degree in pharmacy, with appropriate experience or advanced training in an area of pharmacy or other health care discipline. In addition, to the requirements of clinical instructor, there must be clear evidence of a high level of ability in the practice of pharmacy and the potential for excellence in pharmacy or some other health care discipline. The appointee shall also have demonstrated scholarly and/or administrative ability. Recommendations for initial Clinical Track faculty appointment and rank shall be made by the Department Chair for Pharmacy Practice to the Associate/Assistant Dean for External Affairs and the Dean of the College of Pharmacy. The College of Pharmacy Faculty Affairs Committee must review and approve any initial appointment at the Associate Professor or Professor level. The final offer of appointment shall be made by the Academic Vice President. Clinical Track appointments shall be effective for a maximum of two (2) years. Reappointment of Clinical Track faculty shall be made by the Dean at the recommendation of the Associate/Assistant Dean for External Affairs. To be re-appointed, Clinical Track faculty must submit up-dated information regarding their professional qualifications, accomplishments, and licensure. Individuals at the rank of Clinical Instructor who meet the qualifications for Clinical Assistant Professor at the time of reappointment may be appointed to the higher rank at the recommendation of the Associate/Assistant Dean for External Affairs. In general, Clinical Track faculty who do not make themselves available for clinical teaching assignments during the previous appointment period will not be re-appointed in the absence of extenuating circumstances. However, Clinical Track faculty who are not re-appointed may request reinstatement at any time.
Clinical Track Faculty seeking promotion should demonstrate a record of active, consistent, ongoing activity in teaching within the experiential portion of the school's curriculum. Substantial contact time with students, including consistent student interaction is important. The following specific guidelines will be used in assessing the performance and contributions of clinical track faculty.
Teaching is the primary function of the clinical track faculty and is an important criterion in promotion. Every effort is made to recognize and emphasize excellence in teaching. Evidence of teaching competency shall include but not be limited to teaching evaluations. Visits by the Associate/Assistant Dean for External Affairs or designee, teaching aids and documents developed by the clinical track faculty and peer review.
a. Review of rotation objectives and expectations with the students, where applicable.
b. Provision of information to students concerning the goals, objectives and grading system of the course and the expectations of the faculty.
c. The ability to organize the rotation in a reasonable manner consistent with the College of Pharmacy's curriculum.
d. Ability to convey knowledge to students in an understandable manner.
e. The development of teaching aids and demonstrations.
f. In clinical teaching, the candidate is proficient at the clinical skills he or she is teaching the student and demonstrates the ability to teach and guide students in acquiring these skills.
g. The ability to evaluate performance and competencies.
h. In clinical settings serving as a role model to students in dealing with patients and other health professionals.
i. Evidence of ongoing assessment and improvement of the rotation.
2. Professional Achievements, Innovative Practice And Publications An important factor in determining a Clinical Track Faculty's merit for promotion shall be his or her contribution in the form of professional achievement, innovative practices and the dissemination of professional information to peers and other professionals. a. Practice standards and innovation
Activities may include the following:
(i) Evidence of development and maintenance of new or innovative types of pharmacy services
(ii) Evidence that the practice has had or continues to have demonstrable effect on health care outcome within a practice setting
(iii) Evidence that the practice has influenced the nature of other types of health care delivery (e.g. prescribing of physicians or medication administration by nurses) toward more optimal delivery of health care
(iv) Evidence that the practice has led directly to the establishment of new standards of care within the practice setting or within the profession
b. Presentations and Publications
(i) Presentations to professional groups (e.g. pharmacists. physicians and nurses)
(ii) Publications in appropriate journals as well as the less formalized print or electronic media.
(iii) Television and/or radio appearances and presentations relevant to pharmacy practice
(iv) Participation in the didactic program of the College of Pharmacy
a. Professional Participation Recognition will be given to participation in the activities of professional societies in the form of membership on committees, service as an officer or in some other active participation role.
b. University Service
Participation on committees and/or task forces: departmental, program, College of Pharmacy, Campus or University.
c. Community Service
(i) Community Development Organizations
(ii) Charitable Organizations
(iii) Fraternal Organizations The promotion process may be initiated by the Associate/Assistant Dean for External Affairs, or it may be initiated by the Clinical Track faculty member.
Clinical Track faculty independently seeking promotion to the rank of Clinical Associate Professor or Clinical Professor must submit a written request to the Dean in accordance with the College of Pharmacy's faculty promotion and review annual timetable. The procedures and criteria for promotion of Clinical Track faculty shall be similar to regular faculty. The Dean will establish the review process and will forward a letter of recommendation to the Faculty Affairs Committee with accompanying documentation. The Faculty Affairs Committee will review the documentation and respond to the Dean.
III. Faculty Development Plan
The term "faculty development" describes those activities faculty members undertake to maintain and improve their capabilities to perform their academic tasks. While the format of those activities may vary widely, the essential component is that the faculty member is learning. The objectives and motivation for faculty development are different for new faculty compared to established faculty, so we will consider each separately. However, the key to successful development in both cases is planning. There must be cooperative planning between the administration and the faculty member so that realistic goals are set and resources (time and money) may be specifically allocated to establish them. While the every-seven-year sabbatical is the traditional form of academic faculty development, the planning and goal setting must occur annually so that some faculty development goes on continually.