​​​​​​​​​​​​Title II Report​​ and CAEP Measures

University of Findlay CAEP Approved Programs


Initial Licensure offered at the undergraduate and postbaccalaureate levels


Early Childhood grades PK-5

Middle Childhood grades 4-9

Intervention Specialist grades K-12

AYA Life Science grades 7-12

AYA Integrated Science grades 7-12

AYA Integrated Social Studies grades 7-12

AYA Integrated Mathematics grades 7-12

AYA Integrated Language Arts grades 7-12

MA Visual Arts grades K-12

MA Foreign Language grades K-12

MA Health and PE grades K-12

MA TESOL grades K-12

 

Advanced Programs


Principal
Superintendent
School Psychology*to be reviewed next CAEP visit 2027

 

 

CAEP Annual Reporting Measures


The Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP)


The Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) requires programs to provide performance measures to the public regarding eight categories related to program impact and program outcomes. The table below provides summary data for each of the eight measures.


CAEP Annual Reporting Measure 1: Impact on P-12 Learning and Development


The Ohio Department of Higher Education (ODHE) provided value added data for completers.


Description of Data:


Ohio's value-added data system provides information on student academic gains. As a vital component of Ohio's accountability system, districts and educators have access to an extensive array of diagnostic data through the Education Value-Added Assessment System (EVAAS). Schools can demonstrate through value added data that many of their students are achieving significant progress. Student growth measures also provide students and parents with evidence of the impact of their efforts. Educators and schools further use value-added data to inform instructional practices.


Value-Added Data (2016), (2017), (2018), (2019) from Completers


Rating2016   Total   # of Completers is 78
2017 Total   # of Completers is 73
2018 Total # of Completers is 53
2019 Total # of Teachers is 52
Most Effective19 (24%)
13 (18%)
10 (19%)
12 (24%)
Above Average13 (17%)
9 (12%)
6 (11%)
6 (12%)
Average29 (37%)
24 (33%)
10 (19%)
18 (34%)
Approaching Average7 (9%)
16 (22%)
7 (13%)
5 (9%)
Least Effective10 (13%)
11 (15%)
20 (38%)
11 (21%)

 

Value added data provided by the state for the years above indicates 66% of K-12 students are performing at average, above average or most effective on state assessments in 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019. 


Value added data for principals from the state includes:


Employed as PrincipalsPrincipals with value-added dataABCDF
13
13
N=3
23%
N=3
23%
N=2
15%
N=1
8%
N=4
31%

 

Overall, this is a low N to pull trend data. The buildings had 54% medium-high poverty levels.


CAEP Annual Reporting Measure 2: Indicator of Teaching Effectiveness


The ODHE provided data from the Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES) for completers.​
 
Description of Data:


Ohio's system for evaluating teachers (Ohio's Teacher Evaluation System) provides educators with a detailed view of their performance, with a focus on specific strengths and opportunities for improvement. The system is research-based and designed to be transparent, fair, and adaptable to the specific contexts of Ohio's school districts. Furthermore, it builds on what educators know about the importance of ongoing assessment and feedback as a powerful vehicle to support improved practice. Teacher performance and student academic growth are the two key components of Ohio's evaluation system.


An apparent dip in evaluations for the most recent "Initial License Effective Year" cohort comes from the perception that any given year's evaluation results is actually a chronological view of evaluations. Rather, it's a view of the evaluations from that school year, showing four different cohorts of licensed educators. The most recently licensed cohort will eventually have more evaluation results in its second year as more educators find employment as teachers or principals.


Limitations of the Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES) Data:


1. The information in the report is for those individuals receiving their licenses with effective years of 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019. 

2. The teacher evaluation data in this report are provided by the Ohio Department of Education.

3. Due to ORC 3333.041(B), annual results must be masked for institutions with fewer than 10 completers with OTES data.


OTES Data-for the year 2019 from completers
Licensure Year# Accomplished# Skilled# Developing# Ineffective
2016
5
5
<3
<3
2017
<3
8
<3
<3
2018
<3
4<3
<3
2019
3
3
<3
<3

 

Description of Data:


Ohio's ordered school-building closure and subsequent emergency legislation addressing the coronavirus pandemic-related issues (House Bill 197 of the 133rd General Assembly) had substantial impacts on state testing during the 2019-2020 school year. As a result, the OTES/OPES and Value-Added sections of this report will include limited or no data.


Ohio's system for evaluating principals (Ohio's Principal Evaluation System) provides building leaders with a detailed view of their performance, with a focus on specific strengths and opportunities for improvement.


The Ohio Principal Evaluation System (OPES) data reported here are limited in that the information in the report is for those individuals receiving their licenses with effective years of 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019.


An apparent dip in evaluations for the most recent "Initial License Effective Year" cohort comes from the perception that any given year's evaluation results are actually a chronological view of evaluations.


Rather, it's a view of the evaluations from that school year, showing four different cohorts of licensed educators. The most recently licensed cohort will eventually have more evaluation results in its second year as more educators find employment as teachers or principals.



​OPES Data for Completers 2019
License Year
​Accomplished
​Proficient
​Developing
​​Ineffective
​2016
​1
​3
​0
0​
2017
​2
​1
​0
​0
​2018
​1
​0
​0
​0
​2019
​1
​0
​0
​0


The N was less than 10 for all years. The EPP conducts focus groups each year, results from this focus group indicate that completers felt prepared for their current position.  ​


CAEP Annual Reporting Measure 3: Satisfaction of employers and employment milestones


The program administers employer surveys of program graduates from one-year and three-year completers. The employer response rate was 63%. 92% of the employers who returned the survey felt alumni were well prepared.  60% were "very satisfied" while 32% were "satisfied", 8% marked "improving". There were zero who were "not satisfied". 


An employment milestone is passing the Resident Educator Assessment in year three of teaching, the EPP has 100% passage rate:

2019-2020 RESA Data​
Total number of Teachers in RESA for 2019-2020 = 111
Years in RESA
​Total Number of Teachers
​Total Number to Pass RESA
​Year 1
​37
​First year
​Year 2
​16
​3 (19%)
​Year 3
​29
​29 (100%)
Year 4
​29
​All 29 had passed RESA in 2018-2019, their 3rd year


Employer surveys for advanced licensure completers noted 100% satisfaction in 2019-2020. 


CAEP Annual Reporting Measure 4: Satisfaction of completers


Our ODHE completer surveys over the last three years have been strong with many of the institution averages being equal or above the state. From our Advanced Program we have 100% completer satisfaction.​


 

2017-182018-192019-20
ODHE Completer Satisfaction Survey
Mean
UF Mean (70.27% response rate)
State Mean (74% response rate)
UF Mean (77.97% response rate)
State Mean (70% response rate)
UF mean (50% response rate)
State Mean (68% response rate)

 3.8 3.45 3.61 3.49 3.66 3.53

 

CAEP Annual Reporting Measure 5: Graduation Rates


% graduation rate and n2016-172017-182018-192019-2020
Initial92%  N=3788% N=3792% N=3987% N=31
Advanced87%  N=5588% N=2581%  N=5273% N=30

 

Graduation rates for initial programs was 87% in 2019-2020, COVID did have an impact here, three students are still in school and one withdrew. Advanced graduation rate based on four-year period as candidates stop and start at various times, and many candidates decided to take a break with the pandemic.


CAEP Annual Reporting Measure 6: Ability of completers to meet licensing (certification) and any additional state requirements; Title II


Our candidates are passing the Ohio Assessments for Educators test to obtain a Resident Educator License


Ohio Assessment for Educators 2019-2020 Passage Rates:


​Licensure TestTotal # of Test Takers (UG & PB) for 19-20Passage Rate for Total # of Test Takers for 19-20Total # of Completer Test Takers for 19-20Passage Rate for Completer Test Takers for 19-20Passage Rate for State (OH)    19-20
APK: AYA (7-12)9
100%6
100%97%
APK: EC (PK-3)10
90%10
100%93%
APK: Mid Childhood (4-9)7
57%4
100%88%
APK: Multi-Age (PK-12)7
86%6
100%
91%
Art1
100%
1100%79%
Early Childhood Education9
78%7
100%91%
English Language Arts3
100%1100%84%
Health1
100%1100%87%
Integrated Science5
100%5
100%83%
Integrated Social Studies4
50%1100%81%
Mathematics3
67%1
100%
70%
Mid Grades English Lang Arts4
75%1
100%93%
Mid Grades Mathematics3
33%1
100%84%
Mid Grades Science2
100%1
100%86%
Mid Grades S. Studies3
33%1100%84%
Physical Education3
67%2
100%80%
Special Education9
67%4
100%82%
Foundations of Reading20
100%15
100%88%

 


Advanced Principal Candidates passage rate on the OAE exam:


OAE Pass Rate 2019-2020:


Test# Takers# Pass# Not Pass
% Pass% Not PassMean Total Scaled Score-Inst.
Mean Total Scaled Score-State
Educational Leadership (09/13-Present)22
202
91%9%240.3237

 


The Title II report confirms the above licensure data.


CAEP Annual Reporting Measure 7: Ability of completers to be hired in education positions for which they have prepared (initial & advanced levels)


​% employed and (N)2016-172017-182018-20192019-2020
Initial88% N=4280% N=3580% N=5788%   N=57
Advanced100% employed 79% employed in administration N=48100% employed 62% employed in administration
N=51

94% employed 

6% unknown 

55% employed in administration      

N=33

93% employed
7% unknown
        
53% employed in administration      
N=40

 

CAEP Annual Reporting Measure 8: Student loan default rates and other consumer information (initial & advanced levels)


Student loan default rates are based on three years of data so we have the following data: 2015 cohort is 4.6%; 2016 cohort is 4%; and the 2017 cohort is 4.7% for the entire University of Findlay.


Title II Report​


As required by Title II of the Higher Education Act, the University of Findlay College of Education submits a teacher preparation program annual report on OAE pass rates, and other program characteristics to the State of Ohio.  ​


The State of Ohio then submits to the United States Department of Education its annual report on teacher licensure requirements and teacher preparation programs from all university teacher education institutions. The Secretary reports to Congress and the public on the quality of teacher preparation programs in th​e nation. 


View current reports


Ohio Departm​ent of Higher Education

​​

View the current Ohio Department of Higher Education Educator Preparation Performance Report​.